Question:The premillennial position was not held by early church fathers, reformers and some great scholars today. Why?
Why? First off, because that was the singular view taught by the apostles. 🙂 Secondly, these early church fathers were faithful to pass on the teaching of the apostles. They fought hard to “defend the faith once for all delivered to the saints” (Jude 3).
Many of them died as a result of the apostolic faith they proclaimed! Church historians have established that Polycarp was personally discipled by the apostle John – the Spirit-led, human writer of the book of the Revelation (who, we can rest assured, knew a few things about the end of the age and God’s plan for the future!). Polycarp was later marytred for his faith.
So, that begs the question… When did premillenialism start? When and why did the church develop differing views regarding end-times? Let’s look at it…
When did premillennialism start? Way back in the OT! God’s promises to Israel regarding a future messiah-king who would rule and reign forever are recorded throughout the OT canon (Isa 65:17-25; Ezk 37:21-28, Zec 8:1-7; Isa 11, 65:17-25; Ezk 38:33-38). The NT affirms and sheds further light on certain aspects of God’s plan for Israel, the church and the “end times” (Rom 11:1-33; Eph 2:11-3:21; 1 Thess 4:13-5:11). An unbiased, straight-forward grammatico-literal reading of the pertinent prophetic passages of the NT naturally reveals the apostles taught premillennialism.
Church historians tell us that for the first 300-400 years of church history the predominate “end times” position was premillennial. Why did this change? The primary cause was a increasing lack of adherence to a literal interpretation of Scripture. This was somewhat fueled by the advancing growth of the papacy. The church hierarchy began using a form of interpretation known as allegory. The allegorizing of the Bible (making it’s meaning symbolic rather than a straightforward, literal unfolding of the author’s intent) began to introduce all kinds of mischief into Bible interpretation. Sadly, one of the major proponents of this approach was the great theologian Augustine. By the time of the Reformation (1520+ AD), premillennial teaching was nearly extinct.
The reformers were primarily “amillennial” due mainly to the developing theological system known as “covenant theology.” A main tenet of this system is applying the future promises that God made to Israel to the church, in light of Israel’s past rejection of the Messiah. In this system, the church replaces Israel obviating the need for the millennial reign of Christ upon the Davidic throne! (contra Rev 3:7, 5:5, 22:16).
The key to truly understanding the nature and timing of God’s final purpose for history is contained in openly and diligently seeking God’s intent within His Word. That means not following a eschatological/theological system that requires conforming Scripture to that system. Just take Scripture in its plain, literal sense and see what it teaches!
The reason there are many different positions is NOT because the Bible is confused or unclear. It is because people are subject to error, and over the history of the church, the many approaches to understanding these things have become firmly entrenched. We hold to a simple interpretive principle — use the plain principles of grammar and language to ascertain the plain, literal meaning of the text — assume that God chose to communicate clearly & plainly with us about these things, rather than shading meanings and leaving great mystery that requires the interpreter to come up with the meaning. We believe you can arrive at God’s intended meaning in Scripture if you just take it as it stands. Now the dangerous part… are you willing to believe, trust and obey what God has said, no matter where His truth leads you?
We are all finite, fallen and in need of God’s grace every day! We just want to let the plain, literal sense of the bible speak for itself …and when you do, you will naturally arrive at a pre-millennial view. But listen… eschatology is not a cause for division or relational conflict, we love all those who are true followers of Christ, even though we may hold differing views on God’s plan for the future!